The CityBikes project is a good example of the benefits on the so-called "open data". When data is made available, the community is eager to contribute to and improve public services. We are usually regarded as an "open data project", even though less than 10% of our data feeds come from properly licensed, documented and machine readable feeds. Our project showcases the need of a better policy than the PSI Directive [2] regarding re-use of public sector information, and some common misconceptions between representation and data.

The main problem with the PSI Directive is that it does not take into account Public-Private partnerships (PPP). If data ownership or re-use is left out of the deal, the company kidnaps the data and leaves both the city council and its citizens at the mercy of the company providing the service. That is, only the company (or any other company in agreement with the "umbrella company") is to provide applications to use their systems. We as citizens should demand that any project that comes as a result of a public-private partnership should put the data right where it belongs: the public.

When I started this project on the year 2010 little did I know I would end up battling city councils and companies to release their data as public feeds, nor I could imagine pybikes [3] was going to help create apps for all platforms [4] without having to code a single line.